Friday, April 8, 2005

12 noon

Redwood Neuroscience Institute

 

Title "Perceptual Organization of Occluding Contours”

 

Jim Muller

Department of Neurobiology

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Stanford University

 

Abstract:

When attention is directed to a localized region within the visual field, discrimination
of stimuli in that region is enhanced. At the same time, attention modulates responses of visual neurons in specific ways. Recent evidence suggests these effects may be mediated via feedback to visual cortex from oculomotor structures, for example the SC (e.g. Ignashchenkova et al., 2004). To test this, we examined the effects of microstimulation of the SC (current < eye-movement threshold) on the direction discrimination performance of monkeys, and on neural responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Monkeys discriminated the direction of coherent motion of a localized patch of random dots positioned at one of two locations within a large noise field. Performance (i.e. coherence threshold) was greatly improved by a spatial cue indicating the location of the patch of coherent dots. To test the SC’s role in improving performance, we stimulated the SC while measuring the monkeys’ coherence thresholds. If SC microstimulation mediates attention, it should improve performance when the coherent patch is within the movement field (MF) of the stimulated SC site, but not when the patch is remote from the SC MF. Both predictions were confirmed by the experimental results, consistent with SC playing a role in mediating visual attention. At the physiological level, attention affects MT neurons in two ways (Treue & Maunsell, 1999). When two competing stimuli, one preferred and one nonpreferred, are presented simultaneously within a receptive field (RF), attention to the preferred stimulus increases the response (effect #1). But attention to a non-preferred stimulus decreases the response, whether the nonpreferred stimulus is within the RF (effect #2A) or remote from it (effect #2B). To test the SC’s role in causing these effects, we measured visual responses in MT while microstimulating SC. A preferred stimulus was always placed within the MT RF. Non-preferred stimuli were placed within the RF in some experiments and remote from the RF in others. Consistent with the effects of visual attention described by Treue and Maunsell, we found that electrical stimulation of the SC 1) increased responses in MT when the SC MF contained the preferred stimulus (#1 above), and 2) decreased MT responses when the SC MF contained the non-preferred stimulus, whether it fell within (#2A) or outside (#2B) the MT RF. Thus both lines of evidence – behavioral and electrophysiological – are consistent with SC playing a role in mediating effects of attention on visual responses in MT.